GRDDL and OWL/XML

I can't seem to subscribe to the group, thus I cannot easily discuss:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2008May/0001.html
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2008May/0002.html

Please specify the appropriate venue.

Note that I do not believe that "leaving it to the reader" is really  
the best characterization of my views. I won't go into detail until  
we settle on a proper forum, but I believe that my approach is  
compliant with the GRDDL spec and is appropriate for the  
circumstances and that providing XSLT (in this circumstance) is an  
anti-pattern on many levels (I would say this of POWDER too, actually).

This should not be confused with my being anti-GRDDL, or even, in a  
variety of circumstances, with being anti-online XSLT for GRDDL. One  
clear case is the use of "semantic stylesheets" for documents with ad  
hoc extensions (or variant transformations).

This could happen even in an OWL/XML document. For example, instead  
of providing a transformation of *all* the axioms, I may want to only  
provide the subclass relations.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 21:05:50 UTC