- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:46:44 +0100
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, public-grddl-wg@w3.org
In light of David's comment, we're at a concur from HP! :) I think it would be helpful for the OWL WG to have an opinion from the GRDDL WG even subject to all of Dan's riders that the group is very close to closed. [*] I think Harry seemed to have done OK at calling a consensus of those of us in the discussion, and presenting it as "the opinion of those members of the GRDDL WG still active on the mailing list" as opposed to the opinion of the GRDDL WG, would address Dan's point. Jeremy [*] I've just checked the charter, and it does seem as though the group should have been formally closed! The charter has a six month period after rec, and we've now had more like eight.
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 12:47:39 UTC