- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 10:06:00 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "public-grddl-wg@w3.org" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > Hi > > the OWL WG published a WD of a new XML syntax for OWL, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-xml-serialization-20080411/ > > The intent is to provide this in a GRDDL enabled form. > > Is there anyone who would be happy and able to help with such a task? I am rather busy finishing my dissertation right now so I can not help with anything right now, but I think this is highly admirable and ideal use of GRDDL (as is the POWDER use), and would not leave it as an exercise to the reader :) Do keep us updated! > Note - there is currently extensive debate about this task, see the > OWL WG mailing list ... > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008May/index.html#msg71 > > > One of the more interesting ideas conceptually is that the normative > specification is given by the rec track docs, and in some sense, at > least one of the GRDDL transformation property arcs should specify > those documents as giving the transformation. (At least one member of > the group sees positive advantage in only doing that and not linking > to informative XSLT code, but leaving that as an exercise for the reader) > > Help and/or advice would be appreciated .... > > > Jeremy > > > > >
Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 14:06:30 UTC