Re: GRDDL and OWL/XML

On 5/9/08 5:07 PM, "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> I can't seem to subscribe to the group, thus I cannot easily discuss:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2008May/0001.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2008May/0002.html
> 
> Please specify the appropriate venue

public-grddl-comments?
 
> Note that I do not believe that "leaving it to the reader" is really
> the best characterization of my views. I won't go into detail until
> we settle on a proper forum, but I believe that my approach is
> compliant with the GRDDL spec and is appropriate for the
> circumstances and that providing XSLT (in this circumstance) is an
> anti-pattern on many levels (I would say this of POWDER too, actually).

How is use of XSLT an anti-pattern?
 
> This should not be confused with my being anti-GRDDL, or even, in a
> variety of circumstances, with being anti-online XSLT for GRDDL. One
> clear case is the use of "semantic stylesheets" for documents with ad
> hoc extensions (or variant transformations).
> 
> This could happen even in an OWL/XML document. For example, instead
> of providing a transformation of *all* the axioms, I may want to only
> provide the subclass relations.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
> 
> 
> 



P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S. News & World Report (2007).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Received on Friday, 9 May 2008 22:25:48 UTC