- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:21:46 +0000
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Looking through the agenda, I think tests up for discussion this week are as follows. With each I indicate a PASS or FAIL with Jena GRDDL Reader 0.2 (due out this week). I also indicate a DISCUSS to indicate I have more to say, in a follow up e-mail. Or give a brief discussion in-line. Harry Halpin wrote: testlist3.html#langconneg > 7. Misc Test-Cases nominated for approval > + ACTION:HarryH [DONE] to check in a test case on content > negotiation. PROPOSE to approve test-case [13]#langconneg PASS en version DISCUSS testlist2.html#multipleRepresentations > + ACTION: bwm [DONE] to produce a test case with GRDDL > transforms on two different representations (HTML and SVG) > of the same information resource . FAIL DISCUSS testlist3.html#grddlonrdf-xmlmedia-type1 > + ACTION: HarryH [DONE] Test case with GRDDL on RDF served as > [14]application/xml media type. PROPOSE to approve test > case [15]#grddlonrdf-xmlmediatype1 PASS output3 DISCUSS testlist3.html#grddlonrdf > + ACTION: HarryH [DONE] to make 2 test-cases for "what > happens if data-view:transformation is given on an rdf:RDF > root element" serving two different media-types[DONE]. > PROPOSE to approve test-case [16]#grddlonrdf PASS output3 DISCUSS ?? > 8. tests for [17][#issue-mt-ns] > + ACTION: danja sketch the "no, namespace documen triples > aren't part of grddl results" test in e-mail and ask bwm to > check it testlist3.html#xinclude > 9. tests for [18][#issue-faithful-infoset] > + ACTION: Chime to work on details of 2 allowed results of > xinclude test 2 weeks FAIL I take this test to be unfinished, as is xinclude support in my software! testlist1#base-param > 10. tests for [19][#issue-base-param] > + ACTION: DanC to double-check bwm's test-case on > [20]#base-param PASS Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 12:22:22 UTC