- From: Fadi Maali <fadi.maali@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:30:39 +0100
- To: Makx Dekkers <makx@makxdekkers.com>
- Cc: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Thanks for the comments Makx. Both are implemented now as you suggested: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/dcat/index.html -------------------------------------------------- Fadi Maali PhD student @ DERI Irish Research Council Embark Scholarship holder http://www.deri.ie/users/fadi-maali On 25 Mar 2013, at 17:56, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > On 25 Mar 2013, at 16:03, "Makx Dekkers" <makx@makxdekkers.com> wrote: >> Two issues with the Class: Category and category scheme (http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-vocab-dcat-20130312/#class-category-and-category-scheme). >> >> 1. These seem to seem to be defined as a composite class, implemented as ‘skos:ConceptScheme, skos:Concept’. These are actually two classes (Category=skos:Concept and Category Scheme=skos:ConceptScheme). Maybe this is just shorthand in the specification, but it could be clearer if they were presented separately. > > +1, these should be two separate boxes. > >> 2. Could they be called Concept and Concept Scheme? That would make their relationship to the SKOS classes more obvious. If they had the same name, it could make the work of translators easier. > > I agree. > > Best, > Richard > > > >> >> Makx. >> >> >> Makx Dekkers >> makx@makxdekkers.com >> +34 639 26 11 46 >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 30 May 2013 10:31:09 UTC