- From: Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:32:27 +0100
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Phil. I'll put them both on the agenda for next week, and give us some time to discuss them this week (in your absence. We'll be nice. :) ) To the rest of the group: it would be great if you could read through ADMS and RegOrg in preparation for this Thursday. ADMS: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html RegOrg: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-vocab-regorg-20130108/ Cheers, Hadley Hadley Beeman Co-chair W3C Government Linked Data Working Group On 10 May 2013, at 09:39, Phil Archer wrote: > Dear all, > > We didn't have time to look at the ADMS and RegOrg Notes in yesterday's very productive meeting (very good to see ORG and QB heading for CR!) > > As soon as Bernadette and Hadley are able to schedule a slot, I'd like to get ADMS and RegOrg published as Notes (an update in the case of RegOrg). Can I ask the group to make any comments on these in the coming days. I won't be on the call next Thursday (Blame it on Rio [1]) but should be on the following week's call. > > The only issue in ADMS that I'm aware of is whether DCAT will include a contactPoint property. If so, ADMS won't have to define one. AFAIK there are no outstanding issues around RegOrg now. > > Thank you > > Phil. > > [1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086973/ - an early outing for a youthful Demi Moore > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C eGovernment > http://www.w3.org/egov/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 14:10:25 UTC