- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 13:23:27 +0100
- To: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, GLD Chairs <team-gld-chairs@w3.org>
Following the updates I made to ADMS recently, it was reviewed by Nikos Loutas of PwC who effectively speaks for the primary existing implementation of ADMS (indeed the only implementation I'm aware of). I've taken his comments on board and taken action that I believe is most appropriate [1]. That done I believe ADMS is done except for one issue which is the possible inclusion of dcat:contactPoint. If the WG resolves to include dcat:contactPoint then that's what ADMS should use (ADMS is a profile of DCAT, not the other way round). If the WG does not so resolve then adms:contactPoint should stay. Any and all comments welcome of course. Current editor's draft is at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013May/0046.html -- Phil Archer W3C eGovernment http://www.w3.org/egov/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 12:24:12 UTC