- From: Fadi Maali <fadi.maali@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 15:09:54 +0100
- To: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi John, Indeed you are right the action is for ADMS to change from dcterms:hasPart to dcat:dataset and this is captured in the minutes. I can recall that it was also discussed to have dcat:dataset as a sub property of dcterms:hasPart this is not captured in the minutes (I believe this means we can't rely on that). So please consider this as a suggestion which needs to be discussed. Regards, Fadi -------------------------------------------------- Fadi Maali PhD student @ DERI Irish Research Council Embark Scholarship holder http://www.deri.ie/users/fadi-maali On 2 May 2013, at 14:24, John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com> wrote: > Fadi (et.al.): Please see my comment on this new ISSUE; by my reading > of the various minutes, it looked like it was ADMS that was supposed > to change (PhilA's action), not DCAT. > > See esp. the action at http://www.w3.org/2013/04/12-gld-minutes.html#action04 > > John > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Government Linked Data Working Group > Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> ISSUE-66 (DCAT-dataset): Define dcat:dataset as sub property of dcterms:hasPart [DCAT] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/66 >> >> Raised by: Fadi Maali >> On product: DCAT >> >> this was raised during the F2F meeting and there seemed to be agreement on this. >> http://www.w3.org/2013/04/12-gld-minutes.html >> >> >> > > > > -- > John S. Erickson, Ph.D. > Director, Web Science Operations > Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) > <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> > Twitter & Skype: olyerickson >
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 14:10:22 UTC