- From: Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:57:24 +0000
- To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, GLD Chairs <team-gld-chairs@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <22D72B4D-EA15-4362-8B25-909525BB7DD8@linkedgov.org>
1) Thanks for updating the BP bit, Bernadette! 2) Good questions, both re the appropriate deliverable type for the Cookbook and thoughts about its future. 2a) Deliverable type for the Cookbook: For reference, our charter says: [1] Cookbook. The group will produce a collection of advice on smaller, more specific issues, where known solutions exist to problems collected for the Community Directory. This document is to be published as a Working Group Note, or website, rather than a Recommendation. It may, instead, become part of the Community Directory site. Which means we do have a decision to make. I think it might make sense to publish it as a Working Group Note regardless, so that our group's work on it is recognised, and then release the content to an ongoing wiki if someone wants to take it forward. (I'm operating here from the idea that a Working Group Note is an indication that work has ended on a particular topic. [2] Is that an appropriate interpretation for a website as a deliverable?) 2b) The Future of the Cookbook Regardless of the type of deliverable, I'm keen to see it go forward as a live activity, if there is an appropriate group to adopt it. Should we see if there is interest in taking this forward from any of the other linked data working groups? Or might this be wrapped into successor working groups to GLD? (Phil?) Cheers, Hadley [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/charter [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr#WGNote On 7 Mar 2013, at 20:07, Bernadette Hyland wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for putting this together, very helpful. > > Comments: > 1) Updated BP timetable to reflect 14-Mar target date for moving to LC. > > 2) LD Cookbook - does the WG want to see this as a Working Group Note or wiki? What is the likelihood that anyone will update the wiki once the WG ends? > > 3) Community Directory is a working website, not a Working Group Note so I don't know that the milestone indicated is appropriate. > > Thank you again Hadley -- that is a great help to focus our last 3 mos of work. > > Cheers, > Bernadette > > > On Mar 7, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As per our discussions (and our vast number of diverse deliverables!), I've made a few changes to the wiki. >> >> 1. The Main Page now tracks more information for each deliverable. [1] This should help us be organised about getting through the next 12 weeks. >> >> 2. Each deliverable now has a Timetable and Checklist page. Data Cube's timetable page is here as an example. [2] The Timetable page should help you work out what needs to be done when, in order to meet the ambitious goals we've set ourselves within the time we have. >> >> Editors, these pages are for you as much as for us chairs… Feel free to add to them, cross things off as you accomplish them, or do whatever you like to make the pages more useful. >> >> Also, let me know if you have any suggestions for making these more useful. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Hadley >> >> >> Hadley Beeman >> Co-chair >> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Main_Page >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Timetable >
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 11:29:37 UTC