W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Loose ends re: DCAT UCR, ORG last call, ADMS, People and Community Directory

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:51:30 +0000
Message-ID: <5139D0C2.5080909@w3.org>
To: Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>, Gofran Shakair <gofran.shukair@deri.org>
CC: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>

On 08/03/2013 11:51, Hadley Beeman wrote:
> Thanks, Bernadette!
>
> Sandro, how should we deal with these procedurally?  For our deliverables that aren't rec-track or working group notes (e.g., the Community Directory, People ontology, possibly the Cookbook), what is the best way for us to say, "We've finished this.  Here you go, world!" ?
>
> Also, Phil, how do you want to proceed with tying up loose ends around ADMS?

My plan is that between now and Monday afternoon I will be looking at 
ADMS, seeking out relevant e-mails and issues, and creating an updated 
version of the editors draft. I will then ask the WG for consensus on 
allowing that to be published as a WG Note. If approved, my guess is 
that that will be the end of the matter although Notes can always be 
updated if desired.

As for timing - I have to present 'what the W3C GLD is doing with ADMS' 
at a relevant workshop on Wednesday in Brussels (and I'm speaking in 
Amsterdam on a different subject entirely on Tuesday, hence my 
ridiculous timeline).

So, from this week on, ADMS will be available for you to schedule on a 
call as you wish.




>
> Cheers,
>
>     Hadley
>
> On 7 Mar 2013, at 21:11, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> See inline below:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> In organising the GLD wiki, I've made a few assumptions that I can't trace back to meeting minutes.
>>>
>>> My assumptions are:
>>>
>>> 1.  DCAT UCR is a working group note. [1]
>>> 2.  ORG last call will end just before the F2F3, on 10 April. [2]
>>> 3.  The Community Directory will be 'transitioned' like a working group note, meaning: launched by resolution of the group. [3]
>> Not exactly.  It is a working website already.  We're improving it.  It needs to have a succession plan as Sandro correctly highlighted today.  A community group seems as a good an approach as any.
>>
>>> 4.  ADMS will be published as a working group note, since the group's work on it has ended. [4]
>> I think Phil needs to be the internal champion of this effort to make this happen in remaining months....
>>
>>> 5.  People will be published as a working group note, since the group's work on it has ended. [5]
>> No, People isn't going to progress to a WG Note.  With Michael no longer in the WG, it doesn't have a champion to get to WG Note status AFAIK.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernadette
>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/DCAT_UCR_Timetable
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ORG_Timetable
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Community_Directory_Timetable
>>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/ADMS_Timetable
>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/People_Timetable
>>>
>>>
>>> Hadley Beeman
>>> Co-chair
>>> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hadley Beeman
>>> LinkedGov - Technology Strategy Board
>>> hadley@linkedgov.org
>>> hadley.beeman@tsb.gov.uk
>>> 07768 711478
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> Hadley Beeman
> LinkedGov - Technology Strategy Board
> hadley@linkedgov.org
> hadley.beeman@tsb.gov.uk
> 07768 711478
>
>

-- 

Phil Archer
W3C eGovernment

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 11:52:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:38 UTC