- From: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:01:57 +0100
- To: "'Government Linked Data Working Group'" <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
This is the approach we took for ADMS, so I strongly agree. > -----Original Message----- > From: Government Linked Data Working Group Issue Tracker > [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:54 PM > To: public-gld-wg@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-53 (mv-license-to-distribution): Move the license > property from dataset to distribution [DCAT] > > ISSUE-53 (mv-license-to-distribution): Move the license property from > dataset to distribution [DCAT] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/53 > > Raised by: Fadi Maali > On product: DCAT > > moving dc:license from dcat:Dataset to dcat:Distribution to support > the scenario where different distributions have different licenses. > This introduces redundancy when all distributions have the same > license, as license description has to be repeated for each. However, > having this property on the dataset level and stating that > distributions "inherit" it contradicts with RDF semantics and > potentially can result in inconsistencies. Therefore, I suuggest > moving the property dc:license to the level of dcat:Distribution >
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 21:02:27 UTC