Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013

Hi Biplav

Thanks!
So, I can update section Source data [1] from here [2], right?

Best

Boris

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html#source-data
[2]
http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Best_Practices_Discussion_Summary#Source_Data

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Biplav Srivastava <sbiplav@in.ibm.com>wrote:

>
> Hi
>
> I have made changes to the "Source Data" section. The aim of the section
> is to list issues someone publishing data may face and provide practical
> guidelines. It turns out that listing issues is simple (and quite general)
> but resolving them is very context and government dependent. So a
> point-by-point response to issues is not practical.
>
> With the current content, I have improved the text listing issues. I have
> also modified/ added to the general guidelines Ghislain had kindly added
> (thanks!). Especially on being privacy aware (#8).
>
> Please review.
>
> Regards,
> --Biplav
>
> * *
>
>
>
>  From: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com> To: Boris
> Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name> Cc: João Paulo Almeida <
> jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br>, Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>, "
> public-gld-wg@w3.org" <public-gld-wg@w3.org> Date: 02/21/2013 01:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Boris,
> I don't think you should remove the sections.  I think we should still put
> a small section in to specify why these sections are relevant and need to
> be considered [by someone publishing and/or consuming LOD].  We just don't
> have a lot of detailed guidance to offer at this time.  This is just my
> opinion.
>
> Others?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bernadette Hyland, co-chair
> W3C Government Linked Data Working Group
> Charter: *http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/* <http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/>
>
> On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Boris Villazón-Terrazas <*
> boris.villazon@terrazas.name* <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>> wrote:
>
> Hi Bernadette
>
> So, for FPWD purposes I'm going to remove those sections, ok?
> I'll do it tonight.
>
> Thanks
>
> Boris
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Bernadette Hyland <*
> bhyland@3roundstones.com* <bhyland@3roundstones.com>> wrote:
> +1
>
> We've briefly discussed in the WG the that there are a couple parts of the
> BP document should be omitted, Stability  & Versioning being two.  We can &
> should include language describing the issue for consideration however, not
> propose practices to address it IMO.
>
> Thanks,
> Bernadette
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2013, at 11:15 AM, João Paulo Almeida <*jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br*<jpalmeida@inf.ufes.br>>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Bernadette and others,
>
> I have reviewed the section on Stability of the BP document, and I believe
> it is not ready for prime time.
>
> Honestly, I would recommend dropping this section or replacing it by a
> fairly generic piece of text that only raises stability as a concern (one
> or two paragraphs), and points to useful references (further reading). I'm
> not an expert on the topic, but I am willing to volunteer to produce this,
> if the group agrees this is the way to go.
>
> There is a lot of work on long-term data preservation and the "properties"
> described in the text (section 6.3 are quite confusing and do not seem
> focused). This is not a simple issue, see, e.g. (a lot of initiatives are
> listed including standards on long-term data preservation):
>
> *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_preservation*<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_preservation>
> *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAIS* <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OAIS>
>
> Best regards,
> João Paulo
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Boris Villazón-Terrazas <*boris.villazon@terrazas.name*<boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
> >*
> Date: *Sunday, January 27, 2013 5:50 PM*
> To: *Bernadette Hyland <*bhyland@3roundstones.com*<bhyland@3roundstones.com>
> >*
> Cc: *Benedikt Kaempgen <*kaempgen@fzi.de* <kaempgen@fzi.de>>, "*
> public-gld-wg@w3.org* <public-gld-wg@w3.org>" <*public-gld-wg@w3.org*<public-gld-wg@w3.org>
> >*
> Subject: *Re: Minutes for W3C GLD WG telecon 24-Jan-2013*
> Resent-From: *<*public-gld-wg@w3.org* <public-gld-wg@w3.org>>*
> Resent-Date: *Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:50:54 +0000
>
> Thanks Michael, Bernadette
>
> Since Anne and Ron are not available, any volunteer to take care of
> section 13. Stability? Biplav? Joao Paulo?
>
> Best,
>
> Boris
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Bernadette Hyland <*
> bhyland@3roundstones.com* <bhyland@3roundstones.com>> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> Thanks for circulating.  A couple WG members in yesterday's telecon agreed
> to do a thorough review and comment.  This included Biplav and Joao Paulo.
>
> Note: We should update assignments to Anne and Ron who are no longer
> involved in the WG AFAIK.
>
> Cheers,
> Bernadette
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Boris Villazón-Terrazas <*
> boris.villazon@terrazas.name* <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>> wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> Apologies for missing yesterday telecon's ... and for not sending my
> regrets in advance.
>
> Regarding the BP document, I was working with the BP document including
> some comments from outside, e.g, Olaf, but I think it's time to try to
> finalize this first version. We can make the rest of improvements later on
>
> The current version is here [1].
>
> Currently, there are some sections to review, so I would suggest the
> following section and reviewers:
> - Background - Bernadette
> - Linked Open Data Lifecycle -  Boris & Solve the current issue (ISSUE-15)
> - Vocabulary Selection - Boris/Ghis
> - URI Construction - John ERickson/Boris
> - 6. URI Policy for Persistence - Bernadette/John Erickson
> - 8. Specifying an appropiate License - Bernadette
> - 9. Security and hosting -  Michael Pendleton
> - 10. Publishers "Social Contract" -  Bernadette
> - 11. Pragmatic Provenance -  John Erickson
> - 12. Versioning -  John Erickson
> - 13. Stability -  Anne Washington (GMU), Ron Reck
> - 14. Source Data -  Biplav
>
> Reviewers would have one week to review their section, then we'll have
> another week to fix the document. I'll be the one to be doing the whole
> edition, and Bernadette can help me identifying possible minor issues. More
> help is appreciated.
> In summary after two weeks we should have a preliminary stable version of
> the document, so we can publish as a FPWD ....
> Then, we can continue with the weekly updates and improvements.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best
>
> Boris
>
> [1] *https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html*<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/index.html>
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Benedikt Kaempgen <*kaempgen@fzi.de*<kaempgen@fzi.de>>
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> See [1] for today's minutes.
>
> Best,
>
> Benedikt
>
> [1] <*http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-01-24*<http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-01-24>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>