- From: Sarven Capadisli <sarven.capadisli@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:30:02 +0100
- To: Government Linked Data Working Group WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi, If there is a backlog on the following, pointers are appreciated. While working on SDMX-ML transformations, versioning artefacts came up. This is about using RDF properties which corresponds to them. SDMX-ML publishers use @version, and sometimes accompanied with @validFrom and @validTo on CodeLists and Codes. I think their explanations are self-evident without diving too deep into that for the moment. Those attributes and their values are referenced by the components in Data Structure Definitions. As classifications evolve over time, version and validity information reflects those changes. As far as I know, there are no corresponding RDF properties for version, validFrom and validTo in SDMX-RDF. The best "version" like property that I can think of (and do use) is owl:versionInfo. That's fine for now I guess. validFrom and validTo is a bit more tricky. It would be nice to have them satisfy the following: * have range URI (e.g., to use UK refPeriods URI) * be datayped with xsd's time periods I think the separation of validFrom and validTo is necessary as either or both may be available. See also [1]. Would it make sense to have sdmx-concepts for these? Would other properties be welcome? :) e.g., isFinal [1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2013-02-08.html#T10-57-26 -Sarven
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 21:30:33 UTC