- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:54:07 -0400
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 09/27/2012 09:24 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> [Off-topic for the more important thread.]
>
> On 27/09/12 14:02, Phil Archer wrote:
>
>> person:Person is a sub class of both foaf:Person and schema:Person
>> because the latter two include fictitious people - not particularly
>> relevant to public sector data exchange.
>
> Public sector data exchange includes people who don't exist, either
> deliberately (e.g. artificial persona created by a publisher to
> protect privacy) or because that's the nature of the data (e.g. how
> many member registrations on public sector social networks are genuine?).
>
> I not convinced that's sufficient grounds to distinguish foaf:Person
> and person:Person and doing so prevents people using things like
> person:patronymic more broadly.
>
Indeed. I can't see any use for defining a class of "real" people, at
least in a data feed. The other data about them -- like whether they
are alive, where they reside, what country they are a citizen of -- is
much more useful, verifiable, and as far as I can tell obviates any
notion of "real".
-- Sandro
> Dave
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 13:54:16 UTC