- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:34:12 +0100
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
On 11/10/12 13:58, Phil Archer wrote: > Agh! I really should read e-mail threads bottom up... > > Right, take 2. So now I've gone back to the wiki and put back most of > Richard's changes. I think the wording around not using terms from other > vocabs where this one will do is fine in Dave's version so I've kept that. > > s/declare/define/ yes. > > Requiring given formats - OK - that makes sense. Dave - do you think > that bullet could be added to ORG (you didn't include it). I didn't include it because Richard's suggestion came after I had frozen the doc for review. I don't object to adding the bullet on formats but don't regard it as necessary, especially not in ORG's case. Dave > On 10/10/2012 08:56, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> Phil, Dave, >> >> On 4 Oct 2012, at 15:59, Phil Archer wrote: >>>> How about drafting a “boilerplate vocabulary conformance section” in >>>> the wiki, with an eye towards using it (with variations where >>>> appropriate) in all our vocabularies, but also with an eye towards >>>> proposing it as something that's potentially applicable beyond GLD? >>>> >>>> Phil, do you want to take a first stab at this wiki page? >>> >>> Done http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Vocab-conformance >> >> Nice. I've tweaked it a bit. Diff here: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocab-conformance&diff=2907&oldid=2892 >> >> >> Changes: >> >> * Re-phrase the bit about not using terms from other vocabularies to >> simply say, "use terms from this vocabulary where possible" >> * say that profiles may require specific concrete protocols, formats, >> and syntaxes >> * s/declare/define/ >> >> Plus some of Dave's wording tweaks from ORG. >> >> Best, >> Richard >> >
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:34:49 UTC