- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:51:44 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
I've updated the wiki template in line with this. Only the last two
bullet points in the org conformance section are not included in the
wiki. I've added a sentence about this in the intro saying: "Additional
bullet points may be added, particularly relating to a {vocab} profile,
that are specific to the vocabulary in question."
Having done that, how would you and Richard feel about resolving that
all GLD vocabs will use this conformance template? Any objection to
using it for DCAT, Richard?
Phil.
On 06/10/2012 18:18, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> On 04/10/12 14:59, Phil Archer wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/10/2012 09:34, Phil Archer wrote:
>> [..]
>>>> May I therefore propose a slightly different course of action?
>>>>
>>>> How about drafting a “boilerplate vocabulary conformance section” in
>>>> the wiki, with an eye towards using it (with variations where
>>>> appropriate) in all our vocabularies, but also with an eye towards
>>>> proposing it as something that's potentially applicable beyond GLD?
>>>>
>>>> Phil, do you want to take a first stab at this wiki page?
>>>
>>> Sure, I can take that on.
>>
>> Done http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Vocab-conformance
>
> I suspect the final bullet point is a little too specific to ORG, and
> not needed in the general template.
>
> I've changed the phrasing in ORG slightly in responding to two of
> Richard's review comments. If you are happy with those changes then we
> could update the wiki template.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
--
Phil Archer
W3C eGovernment
http://www.w3.org/egov/
http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 13:09:16 UTC