- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:16:03 +0000
- To: Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "Ronald P. Reck" <rreck@rrecktek.com>, Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
On 22 Nov 2011, at 19:12, Bernadette Hyland wrote: >> Perversely perhaps, it seems that a vocabulary hosted on example.eu, example.us or example.gov.uk might face more resistance to uptake than example.ie or example.ly, especially if it spelled out a nice word like semantical.ly (which appears to be available btw). > > Are you kidding?? ly = Libya. Anyone who approves that for government use should have their badge taken away. Seriously?! Unless they work for the Libyan government of course. They have other things to worry about right now, but at some point why shouldn't there be some GLD coming out of www.health.gov.ly or www.higheredu.gov.ly ? Best, Richard (who lived through a revolution as a kid and hence believes that anything is possible) (but acknowledges resulting persistence issues for .dd domains)
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 22:16:47 UTC