public-geolocation@w3.org from May 2024 by author

Anne van Kesteren via GitHub

• Re: [deviceorientation] Make DeviceMotionEventInit members nullable with null default (#141) (Friday, 24 May)

Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

• Re: [deviceorientation] Accessibility Checklist (#131) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Closed: [deviceorientation] Accessibility Checklist (#131) (Wednesday, 29 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Alternative orientation representations? (#182) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] chore: Update README.md (#178) (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: drop Changes section (#161) (Thursday, 2 May)

AS~ABIR~HASAN via GitHub

• Re: [deviceorientation] Security/privacy consideration: cross-origin linkage (#33) (Saturday, 4 May)

himorin / Atsushi Shimono via GitHub

• [geolocation-api] /TR/ missing from latest published version for ED (#155) (Monday, 27 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/geolocation (#154) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Chore: enable markdown shorthands in index.bs (#166) (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: rename spec and update abstract (#154) (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: drop Changes section (#161) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: rewrite permissions section (#165) (Thursday, 2 May)

Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

• [geolocation-api] Pull Request: Correction: check for non-secure contexts (Friday, 31 May)
• [geolocation-api] Non-secure context check vanished from the spec (#156) (Friday, 31 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] /TR/ missing from latest published version for ED (#155) (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Make DeviceMotionEventInit members nullable with null default (#141) (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Make DeviceMotionEventInit members nullable with null default (#141) (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/geolocation (#154) (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] How to check when permission is denied? (#148) (Thursday, 23 May)
• [deviceorientation] Goodies from Accelerometer, Motion, Orientation, Gyro specs to bring over (#186) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Guidance needed: how to acquire compass headings in a future-compatible manner? (#137) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] How to check when permission is denied? (#148) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Combined permission request is problematic (#183) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Combined permission request is problematic (#183) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/geolocation (#154) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/geolocation (#154) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Alternative orientation representations? (#182) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Abstract away underlying sensors (#180) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Combined permission request is problematic (#183) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] How reliable is interval? (#185) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Interval seems confusing (#185) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Monday, 20 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/geolocation (#154) (Sunday, 19 May)
• [deviceorientation] Interval seems confusing (#185) (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Sunday, 19 May)
• [deviceorientation] fire an orientation event need to use the dictionary (#184) (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Alternative orientation representations? (#182) (Sunday, 19 May)
• [deviceorientation] Combine permission request is problematic (#183) (Sunday, 19 May)
• [deviceorientation] Alternative orientation representations? (#182) (Sunday, 19 May)
• [deviceorientation] Fully active checks (#181) (Sunday, 19 May)
• [deviceorientation] Abstract away underlying sensors (#180) (Sunday, 19 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: use bikeshed shorthands for devicemotion firing steps (#176) (Saturday, 18 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] chore: Update README.md (#178) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] Correction: Update acquisition algorithm to define data types and handle cached positions (#153) (Tuesday, 14 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] Alignment with Geo-alignment/GeoPose? (#130) (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: [geolocation-api] Update geolocation acquisition algorithm to explicitly define data types and handle cached positions (#153) (Monday, 13 May)
• [geolocation-api] Pull Request: Update geolocation acquisition algorithm to explicitly define data types and handle cached positions (Monday, 13 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] chore: Update README.md (#178) (Thursday, 9 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: update status text and acknowledgments (#154) (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: chore: fix link in CONTRIBUTING.md (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: chore: Update README.md (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: simplify parse orientation data reading algo (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: use bikeshed shorthands for devicemotion firing steps (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: use bikeshed shorthands in requestPermission() algorithm (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: more bikeshed shorthand usage (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: simplify "significant change in orientation" algorithm (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: use more bikeshed shorthands (Wednesday, 8 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: cleanup fire an orientation event algorithm (Tuesday, 7 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: cleanup requestPermission() algorithm (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: rewrite permissions section (#165) (Friday, 3 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: rewrite abstract (Friday, 3 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: change spec title (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: automatically generate the conformance section (#155) (Friday, 3 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: rename spec and update abstract (#154) (Friday, 3 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: use bikeshed shorthands for task source section (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Chore: enable markdown shorthands in index.bs (#166) (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Chore: enable markdown shorthands in index.bs (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: rewrite permissions section (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: fix allowlist 'self' cross reference (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorials: small fixup to Device Motion section (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: drop Changes section (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: contextualize x, y, z in model a bit more (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: drop Use cases and Requirements section (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: rework scope (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: fixup/modernize examples (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: reword the iIntroduction section (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: automatically generate the conformance section (Thursday, 2 May)
• [deviceorientation] Pull Request: Editorial: rename spec and update abstract (Thursday, 2 May)

navv-christofer-flores via GitHub

• Re: [geolocation-api] Support floorLevel on GeolocationCoordinates? (#122) (Wednesday, 8 May)

Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: automatically generate the conformance section (#155) (Thursday, 2 May)

Reilly Grant via GitHub

• Re: [deviceorientation] How to check when permission is denied? (#148) (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Combined permission request is problematic (#183) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] How reliable is interval? (#185) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Interval seems confusing (#185) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Combined permission request is problematic (#183) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Abstract away underlying sensors (#180) (Tuesday, 21 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Saturday, 4 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Editorial: drop Changes section (#161) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Do we really need 3 permissions policies? (#162) (Thursday, 2 May)
• Re: [deviceorientation] Chore: enable markdown shorthands in index.bs (#166) (Thursday, 2 May)

Theresa O'Connor via GitHub

• [geolocation-api] repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/geolocation (#154) (Friday, 17 May)

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2024 06:26:51 UTC