- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:37:10 +0000
- To: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org> wrote: > Doug, > > On Mar 26, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Doug Turner wrote: > >> matt, I am confused. > > Sorry for the confusion, I thought I spelled out clear enough what was going > to happen in the thread on issue-2 [1]. >> >> Issue-2: Sounds like the tracker for the geopriv proposal we voted down. >> if so, can we close >> Issue-4: Sounds like the same as issue-2. Is this a dup? >> >> We all have spent dozens of hours on Geopriv. We voted it down at the >> f2f. UAs that were present were either on the fence or directly in >> opposition. > > We resolved to publish without including the proposal [2], but that's good > enough. I'm fine with the chairs closing it (especially given John's > message earlier [3]), but as I said before we still need the trail. > Matt, it's fine to close this. As far as I understand nobody in this WG still thinks the issue is open. When closing, it would be good to add the conclusion from the f2f meeting in London (copy & paste from the mtg minutes). I volunteer to do this myself if that's ok with you. Andrei
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 18:37:49 UTC