W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > March 2009

Re: ISSUE-2 (privacy): Should the Geolocation API include privacy information?

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:15:09 +0000
Message-ID: <708552fb0903260515m1fed27dfoc440d620fb02ed3c@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>
Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org> wrote:
>>> This was discussed at length at the Geolocation F2F and it was voted on.
>>>  The Geolocaiton Position object will not include GeoPriv attributes.
>>>
>>> Please explain what has changed that required you to create a new a new
>>> task/issue?
>>
>> It's a catch all issues for tracking the privacy issue, and should be above
>> and beyond just GeoPriv.
>>
>
> To me this looks like an explicit issue related to the Geopriv
> discussion. I thought we concluded that discussion and are now working
> on the wording for the "privacy considerations" sections. Perhaps we
> could close this one (good to track what happened, I agree) and open a
> new issue related to finishing that specific task? We can also have a
> generic issue explaining that we are continuing to look for and invite
> ideas around solving the user privacy problem in the context of the
> Geolocation API and then link to the two other (and more concrete)
> issues?
>

Ping. Does anyone object to the above suggestion?

Thanks,
Andrei
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 12:15:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:52 UTC