- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:15:09 +0000
- To: Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org> wrote: >>> This was discussed at length at the Geolocation F2F and it was voted on. >>> The Geolocaiton Position object will not include GeoPriv attributes. >>> >>> Please explain what has changed that required you to create a new a new >>> task/issue? >> >> It's a catch all issues for tracking the privacy issue, and should be above >> and beyond just GeoPriv. >> > > To me this looks like an explicit issue related to the Geopriv > discussion. I thought we concluded that discussion and are now working > on the wording for the "privacy considerations" sections. Perhaps we > could close this one (good to track what happened, I agree) and open a > new issue related to finishing that specific task? We can also have a > generic issue explaining that we are continuing to look for and invite > ideas around solving the user privacy problem in the context of the > Geolocation API and then link to the two other (and more concrete) > issues? > Ping. Does anyone object to the above suggestion? Thanks, Andrei
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 12:15:53 UTC