W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2009

Re: moving to Last Call

From: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:06:54 -0400
Message-ID: <4A2FAFEE.7010301@bbn.com>
To: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
CC: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Just to clarify, I wasn't expressing opposition to those changes, just 
noting that there should probably be rough consensus on whatever ends up 
in the final document.


Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Hi,
> On topic of moving issues 6 and 7 (renaming 'enableHighAccuracy' &
> moving the 'speed' and 'heading' attributes) to v2 and keeping v1 in
> sync with reality (i.e. shipped implementations), I have seen
> opposition from Allen and Richard. Everyone else who replied seemed to
> be ok with keeping the spec as is. I have therefore moved those two
> issues to V2 and added a note about the reasoning. I think we can now
> move to Last Call?
> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/6
> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/7
> Many thanks,
> Andrei
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 13:07:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:56 UTC