- From: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:47:03 -0400
- To: public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
A question on process: the spec currently says things like, "Implementors who are not taking part in the discussions are likely to find the specification changing out from under them in incompatible ways" and "This is just an informal proposal at this time." Do those stay in for last call? The latter statement in particular is bordering on fallacious considering that all the UAs in the group have already implemented the spec. On Jun 10, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > Hi, > > On topic of moving issues 6 and 7 (renaming 'enableHighAccuracy' & > moving the 'speed' and 'heading' attributes) to v2 and keeping v1 in > sync with reality (i.e. shipped implementations), I have seen > opposition from Allen and Richard. Everyone else who replied seemed to > be ok with keeping the spec as is. I have therefore moved those two > issues to V2 and added a note about the reasoning. I think we can now > move to Last Call? > > http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/6 > http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/7 > > Many thanks, > Andrei > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 13:58:04 UTC