- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 05:51:35 -0700
- To: "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
- CC: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Section 1 s/mask forgoing/mask, forgoing/ s/Clipping path defines/A clipping path defines/ s/applied on a shape/applied on an element/ Section 4 "These effects all apply after any other CSS effects such as 'border' [CSS3BG]. 'CSS effects' is probably too broad - aren't animations 'CSS effects'? I'd expect that to come after clipping/masking. You probably want to say something like: "These effects all apply after any element drawing operations from CSS properties such as 'border'" In the user/local coordinate systems definition, do you need to define what the units are in the last paragraph? The definition of clipping path should read: "Either a combination of SVG graphics elements or a basic shape" Section 5 If there is a mask image failure (empty image, failure to download, etc.) is a stacking context still created? Same question for mask-box-image-source and clip-path. The definition of mask-source-type:auto refers to the <mask-image> type. It should probably be referring to the <image> type s/choosen/chosen/ (2 instances) The <mask-layer> definition should include some line breaks for readability s/no affect if/no effect if/ The last paragraph of 5.11.1 needs an "or the luminance..." clause. Section 6 Should the <mask-image> value be <image> or <mask-source>? It may be better to duplicate the appropriate descriptions of values and other explanations of the mask-box-image-source property that are applicable from the mask-source property. Section 7 The clip-path property description is missing a definition of the <url> value. Section 8 It mentions CORS for mask-image, and I assume this should apply to mask-box-image-source and clip-path as well.
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 12:52:00 UTC