- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:55:34 -0400
- To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Hi, folks- On 6/12/13 7:48 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2013, at 4:33 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> How would you define it for SVG since it has no concept of a >> 'stacking context'? For HTML, you eventually end up at the >> 'elaborate description of stacking contexts' but there is no such >> thing for SVG. > > You can add it to the SVG specification :) (And in fact we should add > it to the third edition of SVG 1.1 and at some point to CSS > directly.) However, this doesn't even matter for compositing at the > moment. For compositing it is necessary to say that every property > which creates a stacking context does also create an isolation group. > And all the listed properties in Compositing do create a stacking > context. That's it. I seem to recall that we talked about adding a simplified stacking context for SVG, along with a z-index... Cameron, what's the status on that? Regards- -Doug
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 16:55:42 UTC