- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:08:31 -0800
- To: public-fx@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDDxZ7-9iyNjABwo+qcHuTmB=6-wpCSWAZpzFa_Qae3e-w@mail.gmail.com>
All, I updated the spec with these new keywords: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html Please have a look and let me know if this addresses your concerns. Rik On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Nikos Andronikos < nikos.andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au> wrote: > Hey Rik, > > > alpha-blend-mode doesn't correctly describe what is happening imo. >> Although the alpha makes a difference, the operator selects which >> regions contribute - including areas which don't overlap, which is why I >> don't think blend is accurate. >> >> My suggestions would be: >> composite-mode >> composite-operator >> comp-op >> alpha-composite >> >> or if we go with mix, then: >> mix-operator >> mix-comp-op >> >> Is abbreviation to be avoided? >> > > How about mix-composite? > > > works for me. > > > - Nikos > > The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be > confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. > If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, > disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If > you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender > by return email and delete the information from your system. >
Received on Saturday, 17 November 2012 02:08:59 UTC