Re: [filter-effects] New syntax proposal for 'custom' filter function

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:30 PM, David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> > Just checked, animations use IDENT :P. I definitely don't want a
> different syntax for custom() then for animation-name/@keyframes. So yes,
> IDENT is fine for me (no quotes).
>
> What Accept header will be sent for HTTP requests of shaders with
> "format" "glsl"?


I believe we haven't specified about that.
The shader programs are currently downloaded as text. Do you think the
programs should be requested for mime types x-shader/x-vertex or
x-shader/x-fragment?