- From: Dirk Schulze <vbs85@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:05:49 +0100
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, public-fx@w3.org
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: >> CSS Filters [1] is using a comma-free syntax for arguments to the filter functions. This leads to things like: >> >> filter: gamma(0.5 0.2 0.2); >> >> I think it's wrong for this to be different to transforms[2], which currently uses commas. We have to do one or the other, not mix and match. >> >> Simon >> >> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/raw-file/tip/filters/index.html#FilterFunction >> [2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/ > > This change was made at my request to match other functions which we > are attempting to develop in a comma-less manner when possible. Maybe the comma in CSS3 transforms can get optional like for SVG transforms[1]? We would get a common pattern across CSS features. Dirk [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/coords.html#TransformAttribute
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 14:06:28 UTC