Re: Comma separation in functional syntax (filters, transforms)

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Simon Fraser <> wrote:
> CSS Filters [1] is using a comma-free syntax for arguments to the filter functions. This leads to things like:
>  filter: gamma(0.5 0.2 0.2);
> I think it's wrong for this to be different to transforms[2], which currently uses commas. We have to do one or the other, not mix and match.
> Simon
> [1]
> [2]

This change was made at my request to match other functions which we
are attempting to develop in a comma-less manner when possible.


Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 03:05:03 UTC