On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Cameron McCormack: > > > Well, you would still need to define what <g style="transform: ..."> >> > does. Unless you wanted to drop the style="" attribute too. >> > > Rik Cabanier: > > From stand-alone SVG? I would say yes unless a lot of people already >> rely on this. >> > > I think a lot of people do rely on style="", since that is what Inkscape > outputs. > > > > I would hope CSS Animations would work in this situation. >> >> I agree that it would be nice. I believe that none of the current >> browsers support SMIL if the SVG is loaded through an <IMG> tag. >> > > Firefox, WebKit and Opera all do run SMIL animations in SVG documents > referenced from <img>. > Sorry about that! I remember running that experiment and only getting SMIL to work with 'object' and 'embed'. Rik
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 06:21:12 UTC