W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Dropping angle-bracket syntax for animation

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:50:57 +1200
Message-ID: <4E378231.5020001@mcc.id.au>
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>, public-fx@w3.org
Cameron McCormack:
> > Well, you would still need to define what <g style="transform: ...">
> > does.  Unless you wanted to drop the style="" attribute too.

Rik Cabanier:
> From stand-alone SVG? I would say yes unless a lot of people already
> rely on this.

I think a lot of people do rely on style="", since that is what Inkscape 

> > I would hope CSS Animations would work in this situation.
> I agree that it would be nice. I believe that none of the current
> browsers support SMIL if the SVG is loaded through an <IMG> tag.

Firefox, WebKit and Opera all do run SMIL animations in SVG documents 
referenced from <img>.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 04:51:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:38 UTC