Re: Dropping angle-bracket syntax for animation

Cameron McCormack:
> > Well, you would still need to define what <g style="transform: ...">
> > does.  Unless you wanted to drop the style="" attribute too.

Rik Cabanier:
> From stand-alone SVG? I would say yes unless a lot of people already
> rely on this.

I think a lot of people do rely on style="", since that is what Inkscape 
outputs.

> > I would hope CSS Animations would work in this situation.
>
> I agree that it would be nice. I believe that none of the current
> browsers support SMIL if the SVG is loaded through an <IMG> tag.

Firefox, WebKit and Opera all do run SMIL animations in SVG documents 
referenced from <img>.