- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:50:57 +1200
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>, public-fx@w3.org
Cameron McCormack: > > Well, you would still need to define what <g style="transform: ..."> > > does. Unless you wanted to drop the style="" attribute too. Rik Cabanier: > From stand-alone SVG? I would say yes unless a lot of people already > rely on this. I think a lot of people do rely on style="", since that is what Inkscape outputs. > > I would hope CSS Animations would work in this situation. > > I agree that it would be nice. I believe that none of the current > browsers support SMIL if the SVG is loaded through an <IMG> tag. Firefox, WebKit and Opera all do run SMIL animations in SVG documents referenced from <img>.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 04:51:31 UTC