W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Dropping angle-bracket syntax for animation

From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:00:38 -0700
To: Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
CC: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA5C44BC.DED5%vhardy@adobe.com>
Hi Brian,

See comments below.

Kind regards,

From:  Brian Birtles <birtles@gmail.com>
Date:  Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:39:49 -0700
To:  "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Cc:  www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Subject:  Dropping angle-bracket syntax for animation


2) Consistency. No other major feature in SVG is available only with
CSS. It seems unusual to have to switch syntax for animation only.

>> Yes, I think that is a good point.


5) XML toolchain. By providing an angle-bracket syntax, content can be
more easily manipulated and generated by existing XML tools. For
example, in my experience it is simpler to produce XML elements than
plain text with XSLT.

>> Yes, I agree that is the case.
Received on Monday, 1 August 2011 19:04:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:38 UTC