- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:31:25 -0400
- To: <public-forms@w3.org>, <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
Thank you for your comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ 0011 on the XML Base Second Edition PER. Regarding: > It is not clear from the spec about what is > permitted to be considered a URI in a host > language. The spec refers to URIs everywhere, > without exactly specifying what qualifies. In > particular we hope that XML Base may be used at > any point some value is interpreted as a relative > URI/IRI, even if that value isn't a URI per se. The XML Core WG has reviewed this comment and decided not to make any change to XML Base Second Edition with the following explanation: It would not be right for XML Base to define what strings should be considered URIs. That is entirely up to the XML vocabulary in question. This spec addresses the question: *given* a relative URI, how is it resolved? It thus fills the role described in RFC 3986 section 5.1.1: it specifies how a base URI can be embedded in XML content. See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/ 0000 and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/ 0006 for previous reponses. We hope to transition XML Base to Recommendation within the next few weeks. Please let us know if you accept our disposition of this comment as soon as feasible. If we have not heard by September 22, we will assume you have no objection to our resolution. Paul Grosso for the XML Core WG
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 16:33:41 UTC