- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:53:22 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFCD8700E7.120E2269-ON882572CF.006C8FE6-882572CF.006D4201@ca.ibm.com>
I think we were pretty close to a conclusion on the telecon about the interpretation of the readonly MIP for trigger. Whatever the decision, it seems worthwhile make note of it in the spec given that we had some work to do getting through the points ourselves. Let's see if we can get this wrapped up on the list during the week and/or get a clear statement of resolution that folks can vote on next week if necessary. Here is what I understood from the discussion: 1) Like all other events for MIPs, the xforms-readonly and xforms-readwrite events are received by a trigger bound to a node (when the processing model says those events are to be dispatched, of course). 2) The readonly MIP is a statement about the what can happen to the data node. Since a trigger does not directly manipulate the data node via its UI binding, there is no direct relationship between the data node being readonly and presentational properties of the trigger. Specifically, a) The ability to activate a trigger is not disabled if the trigger is bound to a readonly node b) The default countenance of the trigger is unaffected, i.e. it does not take on a disabled countenance Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2007 19:53:35 UTC