- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:15:50 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFF03757C0.F085983E-ON88257315.00697D62-88257315.0069D52E@ca.ibm.com>
The following arrived on www-forms-editor: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Jul/0010.html It asks that we add a root element for XForms to our schema so that XForms can be stored without needing a host language. I think the answer here is that you don't need us to do that. One can simply define one's own envelope element in any namespace except ours, and that element becomes a mini-host language. Doing this does not introduce a schema validation problem for XForms content, right? Doing so would not introduce a problem for the new schema for XForms 1.1, right? If correct, please send response to Guntis. Otherwise, please discuss issues on public-forms so we can give Guntis a timely response. Thank you, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 19:16:21 UTC