W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Schema question needing response from www-forms-editor

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:07:48 +0200
Message-ID: <46975D04.9050707@orbeon.com>
To: public-forms@w3.org

John Boyer wrote:
 > The following arrived on www-forms-editor:
 >  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Jul/0010.html
 > It asks that we add a root element for XForms to our schema so that
 > XForms can be stored without needing a host language.
 > I think the answer here is that you don't need us to do that.  One can
 > simply define one's own envelope element in any namespace except ours,
 > and that element becomes a mini-host language.
 > Doing this does not introduce a schema validation problem for XForms
 > content, right?
 > Doing so would not introduce a problem for the new schema for XForms
 > 1.1, right?

It certainly shouldn't, although Mark is probably the best person to
answer this!

 > If correct, please send response to Guntis.  Otherwise, please discuss
 > issues on public-forms so we can give Guntis a timely response.

I also don't think we need to introduce such a root element.


Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 13:16:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:13:52 UTC