- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:24:29 +0200
- To: public-forms@w3.org
John & all, I raised this point already, if I dare say in more details ;-) See point 4 in this message, which hasn't yet been considered by the WG: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007May/0010.html Best, -Erik John Boyer wrote: > > The spec appears to contain a sentence which says "Dynamic dependencies > are supported in UI bindings based on conformance profile." > > I wasn't aware they were anything but required, and the conformance > section does not call this out as being at the 'should' or 'may' level. > Not even the offending sentence in section 7 uses the proper term. > > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2007 00:24:36 UTC