- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:58:46 -0400
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4FF9AE36.1020407@openlinksw.com>
On 7/8/12 11:15 AM, Michiel de Jong wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> For sake of experiment, make yourself a WebID via the service at: >> http://id.myopenlink.net/certgen . > yes, i have one, and i like webid in that it's end-to-end, but i think > technologies like webid and pgp can by definition never be more than > an option for power users. Doesn't have to be so. We can simplify the end-user experience, big time! > > IMO we should give a default option that can work with a simple-to-use > user address and password combination, and then describe a power user > option based on client-side certificates. That's in place, technology wise, the rest is UI/UX patterns. > > as Markus said, the default option should probably be based on the > OpenID Connect work (which is basically the same as saying it should > be discoverable OAuth i think - openid and oauth are sort of > interrelated). You can't predict the optimal default. Thus, always present options. > but only saying 'nodes should implement OpenID Connect' > is not enough to solve these two use cases, i think? Scanning over > http://openid.net/connect/ i see no explicit mention of friend lists, > but maybe i didn't read carefully enough? People just need a (Web|Net)ID. Every Unix user has a user id or userid. The Web and Internet are still WANs based on Unix concepts. > > Btw, the Lanyrd example is easier to achieve, because it's about who > you follow, which is something your node can authoratively report on. "Who" needs to be a verifiable identity. Everything comes after that, including who you follow, what you've made, when it was made, where it was made, and eventually at chance at subjectively computing: why it was made . > The AirBnb case is about who follow (and thus implicitly endorse) you, > for which we probably need some sort of signatures? i think this is > built into foaf? Nothing to do with FOAF, but everything to do with a verifiable identifier protocol such as WebID or NetID (when we go beyond http: URI specificity and RDF doc formats). > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Sunday, 8 July 2012 15:59:09 UTC