- From: Matthias Brantner <matthias.brantner@28msec.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:23:21 -0700
- To: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
- Cc: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>, public-expath@w3.org
I'll start migrating some of the tests to the new FOTS format. Zorba does have a driver for this format but it's not 100% ready, yet. Matthias On May 13, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Christian Grün wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > I completely agree! As you have already written some FOTS tests, it > would be great if you could start converting the existing tests. I'll > be glad to join in as soon as we have a common baseline. > > Best, > Christian > ____________________________ > >> Thanks Christian for sharing your tests. That's a great start. However, >> wouldn't it be nice to use the new >> W3C FOTS way to describe and run tests? This would make it a lot easier for >> non-java processors to run >> the tests. As far as I know, most of the implementations are already able to >> process this test description >> format. >> >> Matthias >> >> On May 10, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Innovimax SARL wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Christian Grün from Base X just gave the link to some test they are using >> for BaseX >> >> These test are under a BSD licence so it means anybody could use them >> >> First, thanks to Christian to have made such tests available >> >> They are provided as Java JUnit test >> >> If I'm right all but one implementation that are in the implementation >> matrix are Java based. >> >> It means that people may use those test >> >> If some people could try to make those tests run against other >> implementation we could start collecting results >> >> Of course, if there is other test case available somewhere else, please tell >> us >> >> Thanks >> >> Mohamed >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> We have written several JUnit tests for most of the implemented >>> specifications.. >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/tree/master/src/test/java/org/basex/test/query/func >>> >>> ..some of which could probably be adapted for general use. >>> >>> Looking forward to everyone's opinions, >>> Christian
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 17:23:56 UTC