- From: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 22:12:07 +0200
- To: Matthias Brantner <matthias.brantner@28msec.com>
- Cc: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>, public-expath@w3.org
Hi Matthias, I completely agree! As you have already written some FOTS tests, it would be great if you could start converting the existing tests. I'll be glad to join in as soon as we have a common baseline. Best, Christian ____________________________ > Thanks Christian for sharing your tests. That's a great start. However, > wouldn't it be nice to use the new > W3C FOTS way to describe and run tests? This would make it a lot easier for > non-java processors to run > the tests. As far as I know, most of the implementations are already able to > process this test description > format. > > Matthias > > On May 10, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Innovimax SARL wrote: > > Dear all, > > Christian Grün from Base X just gave the link to some test they are using > for BaseX > > These test are under a BSD licence so it means anybody could use them > > First, thanks to Christian to have made such tests available > > They are provided as Java JUnit test > > If I'm right all but one implementation that are in the implementation > matrix are Java based. > > It means that people may use those test > > If some people could try to make those tests run against other > implementation we could start collecting results > > Of course, if there is other test case available somewhere else, please tell > us > > Thanks > > Mohamed > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> We have written several JUnit tests for most of the implemented >> specifications.. >> >> >> https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/tree/master/src/test/java/org/basex/test/query/func >> >> ..some of which could probably be adapted for general use. >> >> Looking forward to everyone's opinions, >> Christian
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 20:13:07 UTC