- From: Matthias Brantner <matthias.brantner@28msec.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 12:02:47 -0700
- To: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-expath@w3.org, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
- Message-Id: <E4DE0DDD-C62B-4C7E-8F6B-75EDE4A260AB@28msec.com>
Thanks Christian for sharing your tests. That's a great start. However, wouldn't it be nice to use the new W3C FOTS way to describe and run tests? This would make it a lot easier for non-java processors to run the tests. As far as I know, most of the implementations are already able to process this test description format. Matthias On May 10, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Innovimax SARL wrote: > Dear all, > > Christian Grün from Base X just gave the link to some test they are using for BaseX > > These test are under a BSD licence so it means anybody could use them > > First, thanks to Christian to have made such tests available > > They are provided as Java JUnit test > > If I'm right all but one implementation that are in the implementation matrix are Java based. > > It means that people may use those test > > If some people could try to make those tests run against other implementation we could start collecting results > > Of course, if there is other test case available somewhere else, please tell us > > Thanks > > Mohamed > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote: > We have written several JUnit tests for most of the implemented specifications.. > > https://github.com/BaseXdb/basex/tree/master/src/test/java/org/basex/test/query/func > > ..some of which could probably be adapted for general use. > > Looking forward to everyone's opinions, > Christian > > > > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 19:03:25 UTC