- From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:47:57 +0100
- To: "Johannes Busse" <jbusse@jbusse.de>, "Bob DuCharme" <bob@snee.com>
- Cc: "SKOS" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
Especially in RDFa it is easy to use both, so from the next release of STW I will do something like this: <span property="skos:prefLabel dcterms:title">STW Thesaurus for Economics</span> Cheers, Joachim > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Johannes Busse > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. März 2011 09:55 > An: Bob DuCharme > Cc: SKOS > Betreff: Re: best practice property to use for naming a > skos:ConceptScheme > > Hi Bob, > > > whether rdfs:label or skos:prefLabel would be better, ... > > http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/ says: > > "S11: skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel and skos:hiddenLabel are > each sub-properties of rdfs:label." > > "5.6.1.: no domain is stated for skos:prefLabel ... using the > properties skos:prefLabel ... to label any type of resource > is consistent with the SKOS data model." > > In general you say more if you use rather specific > properties. It's then the task of a reasoner to compute the > generalization. > > If one is sure he or she intends the meaning which is > connotated with the skos namespace: Why not use it? > > best > Johannes > -- > Dr. Johannes Busse > Bahnhofstr.9, 68535 Edingen > www.jbusse.de | jbusse@jbusse.de > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2011 10:48:33 UTC