- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:53:06 +0100
- To: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Cc: public-esw-thes@w3.org
On 22/1/09 15:56, Neubert Joachim wrote: > The SKOS Primer recommends using dc:subject for indexing purposes. For > the inverse relation - this concept "is subject of" or "indexes" that > resource - it gives no recommendation. The discussion about indexing > properties in SKOS (commendably summarized in > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/Indexing) also paid no > attention to the now vanished skos:isSubjectOf. > But it's definitively missing. My use case is this: > On the upcoming RDFa-enriched web pages for the Standard Thesaurus > Economics (maintained by the German National Library of Economics, ZBW), (nice work btw :) > we will include links to library resources. This links trigger a search > for the concept at hand in the subject index of the library database - e.g. > http://www.econis.eu/DB=1/LNG=EN/CMD?ACT=SRCHM&IKT3=46&TRM3=Black+market > <http://www.econis.eu/DB=1/LNG=EN/CMD?ACT=SRCHM&IKT3=46&TRM3=Black+market> > searches for the concept http://zbw.eu/stw/descriptor/19289-4 with the > prefLabel "Black market" and returns a result page with further links to > books, articles and so on (not RDFa-enriched up to now, but this could > change). Can you use rev= instead of rel= in RDFa notation? cheers, Dan -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 16:53:48 UTC