- From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:37:08 +0100
- To: "'carlmattocks@checkmi.com'" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com>, "Miles, AJ (Alistair) " <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: 'Stella Dextre Clarke' <sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk>, "'public-esw-thes@w3.org'" <public-esw-thes@w3.org>
I support this suggestion from Carl. Al. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Carl Mattocks > Sent: 07 October 2004 16:35 > To: Miles, AJ (Alistair) > Cc: 'Stella Dextre Clarke'; 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' > Subject: RE: subject indicators ... ? > > > > Al: > > Perhaps as a placekeeper you should just use > PublishedSubjectIndicator and > give the OASIS folks the luxury of defining / defending that > paradigm (it > is NOT easy). > > carl > <quote who="Miles, AJ (Alistair)"> > > > > Thanks Stella. > > > > I agree, the name 'indicator' is a bit vague ... I > originally suggested it > > because of the parallel with the OASIS published subject indicator > > paradigm, > > and in the additional hope of building a bit of overlap > with topic-map > > standards. > > > > I think 'authority' and 'source' are unfortunately a bit > overloaded ... > > > > Some more ideas (brainstorming here): 'resolveTo' 'resolutionTarget' > > 'webPresence' 'webDescriptor' ... (still not discounting > 'indicator') ??? > > > > Al. > > > > --- > > Alistair Miles > > Research Associate > > CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > > Building R1 Room 1.60 > > Fermi Avenue > > Chilton > > Didcot > > Oxfordshire OX11 0QX > > United Kingdom > > Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk > > Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Stella Dextre Clarke [mailto:sdclarke@lukehouse.demon.co.uk] > >> Sent: 07 October 2004 12:15 > >> To: 'Miles, AJ (Alistair) '; public-esw-thes@w3.org > >> Subject: RE: subject indicators ... ? > >> > >> > >> Just trying to catch up with this one. I guess such a > >> property could be > >> useful. The purpose seems to be to point to the place where > >> you can find > >> out the most authoritative information available about a concept. I > >> begin to wonder whether the name should involve something > >> like "source" > >> or "authority", although I don't have any objection to "indicator", > >> except perhaps that it is vague. I can't point to any existing > >> convention for what people tend to call this type of > >> property, since it > >> is a fairly new way of doing things. I see it as perhaps a way of > >> providing added value to the traditional thesaurus model, and > >> time will > >> tell whether and how people find it useful. ( It's not > easy trying to > >> make up standards in advance of precedents!) > >> Cheers > >> Stella > >> > >> ***************************************************** > >> Stella Dextre Clarke > >> Information Consultant > >> Luke House, West Hendred, Wantage, Oxon, OX12 8RR, UK > >> Tel: 01235-833-298 > >> Fax: 01235-863-298 > >> SDClarke@LukeHouse.demon.co.uk > >> ***************************************************** > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > >> [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Miles, AJ > >> (Alistair) > >> Sent: 06 October 2004 14:22 > >> To: 'public-esw-thes@w3.org' > >> Subject: FW: subject indicators ... ? > >> > >> > >> > >> >AJM said: > >> Also I wasn't talking about identifying concepts in relation > >> to *someone > >> elses* indicators, although this would be a possibility [with the > >> implication that (?x skos:indicator ?i) (?y skos:indicator > ?i) -> (?x > >> skos-map:exactMatch ?y)]. > >> > >> So I just realised that, if allowed to be used in this way, > >> of course a > >> 'skos:indicator' type property *should not* be an IFP. > >> > >> An alternative name has been suggested to me, something > involving the > >> word 'indicative' ... e.g. 'indicativeRepresentation' > >> 'indicativeResource' ... just throwing ideas out, hoping to > >> work towards > >> a name that reflects well the intended usage. > >> > >> Al. > >> > >> --- > >> Alistair Miles > >> Research Associate > >> CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > >> Building R1 Room 1.60 > >> Fermi Avenue > >> Chilton > >> Didcot > >> Oxfordshire OX11 0QX > >> United Kingdom > >> Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk > >> Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440 > >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: public-esw-thes-request@w3.org > >> > [mailto:public-esw-thes-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Leonard Will > >> > Sent: 05 October 2004 16:49 > >> > To: public-esw-thes@w3.org > >> > Subject: Re: subject indicators ... ? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > In message > >> > <350DC7048372D31197F200902773DF4C05E50C6E@exchange11.rl.ac.uk> > >> > on Tue, 5 > >> > Oct 2004, "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> wrote > >> > >The idea I had for a 'skos:indicator' property is that it > >> > points to a > >> > >web resource that consists of a *complete* description of > >> > the concept. > >> > >This should include labels, definitions, examples, etc. > >> > where present. > >> > > >> > I would think that the only place you would find a suitable > >> > *complete* > >> > description would be within a knowledge organisation scheme > >> that had > >> > been compiled in accordance with the standards that you are > >> > using. Are > >> > you then just in the situation of borrowing elements from > >> > other KOSs - > >> > i.e. merging or mapping? > >> > > >> > >Such a 'skos:indicator' property would also provide an > >> > alternative to > >> > >resolvable URIs for concepts ... i.e. you can have a > concept with a > >> > >non-resolvable URI, and if you are looking for a complete > >> > >(content-negotiable) description of that concept, you > look up the > >> > >'indicator'. > >> > > >> > What could an "indicator" be if it pointed to a web resource > >> > but was not > >> > a URI? I thought that a URI was a general name for something that > >> > pointed to a web resource. > >> > > >> > I'm not sure what you mean by "content-negotiable". > >> > > >> > Leonard > >> > -- > >> > Willpower Information (Partners: Dr Leonard D Will, > >> > Sheena E Will) > >> > Information Management Consultants Tel: +44 > >> > (0)20 8372 0092 > >> > 27 Calshot Way, Enfield, Middlesex EN2 7BQ, UK. Fax: +44 > >> > (0)870 051 7276 > >> > L.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk > >> > Sheena.Will@Willpowerinfo.co.uk > >> > ---------------- <URL:http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk/> > >> > ----------------- > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Carl Mattocks > > co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC > co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC > CEO CHECKMi > v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 > www.CHECKMi.com > Semantically Smart Compendiums > (AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi >
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 15:37:48 UTC