Re: EOCred: show other requirements

It seems vague for descriptive value, so I wonder how effective it would be
when "lots" of diverse use cases get thrown at it. We do have a minimum age
for things like drivers licenses and pilots licenses. But should this be
called out specifically? in LRMI we have *typicalAgeRange* .

for an electrician's license (and no doubt magicians require this too) we
need a certain number of hours as an apprentice before advancing but is
this hour requirement itself a competency?

there are a couple of attributes in schema.org for time related
descriptions which might possibly be applied, rather than creating
something new, or throwing these kinds of details into a "General box":

http://schema.org/timeRequired Approximate or typical time it takes to work
with or through this learning resource for the typical intended target
audience, e.g. 'P30M', 'P1H25M'. Would this apply for a traineeship period?

If before a journeyman license one needs to complete the apprentice
requirements then the apprentice requirements would have the timeRequired
attribute. But I go back to are we describing the course or the credential?

http://schema.org/validFor The time validity of the permit. (which might be
good to use if we are talking about the expiration date of credentials.

http://health-lifesci.schema.org/activityDuration - what is the structural
difference between an exercise plan and a learning/life experience plan?


Thoughts?
- Hugh Paterson III



On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:55 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote:

> Not all requirements for educational and occupational credentials are
> related to competencies. Examples include minimum age requirements or a
> period of work experience as a trainee.
>
> We could deal with this with a new property:
>
> name: otherRequirements
>
> definition: conditions such as a traineeship period, or minimum age, etc.
> that must be fulfilled in order to hold this Educational Occupational
> Credential. Do not use for competency requirements or fees.
>
> Does anyone think that this is not necessary?
>
> Phil
> --
>
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning;
> information systems for education.
> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education
> technology.
>
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
> number SC569282.
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
> England number OC399090
>