- From: Dr D.C.Misra <dc_misra@hotmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 01:18:21 +0530
- To: <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
---Original Message----- From: Jose M. Alonso [mailto:josema@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:04 PM To: Dr D.C.Misra Subject: Re: Group Note FPWD is done Dear Dr D.C.Misra, Thanks for your comments. Could you please forward them to the <public-egov-ig@w3.org >? This is required for them to be taken into consideration (see status section of the document). Best, Jose. El 04/03/2009, a las 9:58, Dr D.C.Misra escribió: > I do not feel comfortable with the spelling of e-government as > "eGovernment," much worse at the beginning of a sentence. This is > grammatically wrong. (Similarly "eGov" is not in order. Which word > does it > abbreviate- e-government or e-governance? Secondly, inter-changeable > use of > e-government and electronic government (and, by extension, digital > government) do not make for "smooth" reading. I think it may be > useful to > stick to only one term, namely, e-government though digital > government may > be more correct technically. The term electronic government could > perhaps be > avoided altogether as it makes e-government to be a 50:50 affair > between "e" > and government. On the contrary, the term e-government gives 1/11 > weight to > "e" and (overwhelming) weight of 10/11 to government (going by > number of > letters) which appears more appropriate. I am not aware of any > guideline/practice or standard laid down in this regard by W3C in > which case > its guideline/practice or standard no doubt has to be followed in > this paper > too. > > Dr D.C.Misra > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-egov-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-egov-ig-request@w3.org > ] > On Behalf Of Jose M. Alonso > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 3:39 PM > To: eGov IG > Subject: Group Note FPWD is done > > All, > > It has been a very intense weekend. Some of us, namely Kevin, John and > me have been working until the very last minute on developing the > final draft. We have worked on the document until yesterday night, > then called it done. > > Final document is a snapshot of the current Editor's Draft [1] and we > are requesting publication on March 10; comments will be welcomed > until April 26. > > Thanks John, Oscar, Daniel and Owen for providing content for the > document. Very special thanks to Kevin for bearing with me over the > last couple days and a great editorial work. > > I think the document is quite solid but no doubt that with the help of > others it could be greatly improved, so do not hesitate to send > comments or offering authoring help. > > Cheers, > Jose. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/Group/docs/note > > -- > Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org> W3C/CTIC > eGovernment Lead http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/ > >
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 05:47:15 UTC