- From: Jose M. Alonso <josema@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:09:46 +0100
- To: eGov IG <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>, Kevin Novak <kevinnovak@aia.org>, John Sheridan <John.Sheridan@nationalarchives.gov.uk>
We mentioned the DC Transparency Camp -- http://transparencycamp.org/ -- at the Group call, and I've just been reminded of this. Quoting http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2009Mar/0014 "This followed another talk there by George Thomas, from the U.S. government website recovery.gov [4], on how the site will put information on the government's economic stimulus spending into the semantic web and the Linked Open Data world via Atom, XHTML, and RDFa. (Very cool.): http://george.thomas.name/omb/recovery.gov.pdf" The slides also add XForms to the mix. I see George is registered for the meeting next week. We might want to encourage him to speak up and show this. -- Jose El 27/02/2009, a las 17:44, Jose M. Alonso escribió: > This subject is (not surprisingly) getting a lot of attention. > I think the listserv was not copied on a previous email exchange, so > I think others would like to read these two blog posts: > > Stimulus Feeds Done Right > http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/2009/02/stimulus-feeds-done- > right.html > Finding Stimulus Feeds > http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/2009/02/finding-stimulus-feeds.html > > This reminded me of something important. It's not enough to release > the data in an open format, blah, blah... the data itself _must_ be > useful! > > -- Jose > > > El 27/02/2009, a las 16:50, Owen Ambur escribió: >> Thanks for the pointer, Allyson. I'm copying the W3C eGov IG's >> listserv since I understand this may be a topic of discussion at >> the IG's F2F on March 12 & 13: http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/wiki/F2F2 >> >> Items from the list provided in the memo that are particularly >> closely related to StratML include: >> >> b. Objectives: a general Recovery Act description of the program’s >> Recovery Act objectives and relationships with corresponding goals >> and objectives through on-going agency programs/activities. >> Expected public benefits should demonstrate cost-effectiveness and >> be clearly stated in concise, clear and plain language targeted to >> an audience with no in-depth knowledge of the program. To the >> extent possible, Recovery Act goals should be expressed in the same >> terms as programs’ goals in departmental Government Performance >> Results Act strategic plans. >> >> h. Measures: expected quantifiable outcomes consistent with the >> intent and requirements of the legislation ... >> >> Date element and Web page requirements are set forth on pages 55 - >> 60. >> >> I posted a link to the memo at http://xml.gov/stratml/index.htm#WorkResults >> >> Owen Ambur >> Co-Chair Emeritus, xmlCoP >> Co-Chair, AIIM StratML Committee >> Member, AIIM iECM Committee >> Invited Expert, W3C eGov IG >> Communications/Membership Director, FIRM Board >> Former Project Manager, ET.gov >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: StratML [mailto:STRATML@LISTSERV.AIIM.ORG] On Behalf Of >> Allyson Ugarte >> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 8:21 AM >> To: STRATML@LISTSERV.AIIM.ORG >> Subject: Recovery Act of 2009-Strategic Plans >> >> Mention is made of GPRA strategic plans - see pages 13-14: >> >> http://www.recovery.gov/files/Initial%20Recovery%20Act%20Implementing%20Guidance.pdf >> >> Each Recovery Program Plan must minimally include: list >> >> Allyson >> >> >> >> ugarte@pipeline.com >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 10:10:35 UTC