W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > October 2019

Re: [dxwg] Differentiating Functional & Data Profiling in Conneg (#1022)

From: Annette Greiner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:57:03 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-545707848-1571882222-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Sorry, but I still think it is a mistake to introduce a new usage of the term "profile" in this specification. Realization was a fine term, as far as I'm concerned. I understand that the word profile can be used to refer to different styles of implementing content negotiation by profile, but it is still a poor choice in a document in which users have struggled to understand the concept of a profile. I've not yet heard any argument why using the term profile in both senses in the same document is a good idea, just defense of it as not being a fallacy. 

GitHub Notification of comment by agreiner
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1022#issuecomment-545707848 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2019 01:57:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:21 UTC