W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 10:21:40 -0700
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <80cc4757-778a-51ee-d42d-397c023168fa@kcoyle.net>
What is meant by "named"? Is a name the same as an identifier? The same
as a title on a document?

Note that we have stated that for content negotiation the resource MUST
have a web-based identifier (URI/IRI). When a profile is a document
(e.g. PDF) then I would say that it SHOULD have an identifier, but if it
doesn't it does not cease to be a profile.


On 7/2/19 2:29 PM, aisaac via GitHub wrote:
> @tombaker I'm keen on "named" because this paves the way for URIs. And
> it's a requirement we've identified, I believe.

Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2019 17:22:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC