W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [dxwg] Revisiting the definition of "profile" (#963)

From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 21:29:25 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-507851591-1562102964-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@tombaker yes "defines" is better. And I am not claiming that we should keep all the enumeration of examples verbatim. But I think some enumeration helps.

@tombaker I'm keen on "named" because this paves the way for URIs. And it's a requirement we've identified, I believe.

@smrgeoinfo @tombaker yes replacing "annotating" by your suggested paraphrase would be very helpful. "Annotate" is perhaps the only word that's more ambiguous than "profile" in our context ;-)

@smrgeoinfo as I've said on the list I'm can live with not calling "profile" the things/specs that are not derived from other things/specs.

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/963#issuecomment-507851591 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2019 21:29:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:18 UTC